logo


Engadget


Google's super high-speed internet service could be expanding to your neighborhood

Netflix

First Posted: 12/12/12 03:40 PM ET Updated: 12/14/12 10:50 AM ET

Google Fiber originally posted Dec 12, 2012 on Engadget by Donald Melanson, Netflix ISP Rankings originally posted Dec 11, 2012 by Darren Murph. Both revised and compiled for AOL by Rob Zanicchi


With a staggering list of digital products, it's safe to say that Google is always looking to provide users on the web with something more. Its new Fiber service -- offering wideband (think broadband on steroids) internet connections along with a growing number of television channel packages -- is already looking like a serious threat to established internet and cable providers. Currently, its only operational in the Kansas Cities, which may leave many admirers anxiously waiting for Google to knock on their door with a pitch. Try to stay calm, the Fiber expansion could soon be a reality.

While on stage at The New York Times' Dealbook Conference, Google's Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt, noted the big broadband effort "isn't just an experiment, it's a real business and we're trying to decide where to expand next." Unfortunately, he didn't offer much more in the way of specifics beyond that.

While the particulars of the expansion are unknown, a Netflix study rendered some stats that may impress doubters of the search giant's new project. The streaming service -- which serves up over one billion hours of video to some 30 million members per month -- recently ranked America's major Internet Service Providers based on "actual performance across all Netflix streams." Its findings show Fiber as now being "the most consistently fast ISP in America, according to actual user experience on Netflix streams in November." Quite a badge of honor for a service that's been active for less than two months.

Runner up, Verizon's FiOS service faired awfully close, but has confirmed it has no plans to expand the infrastructure beyond the 13 states it currently serves. With the closest competition supposedly unwilling to grow, Google's chances of becoming a major player in the broadband and television provider industries just got even better -- building the suspense of where the next Fiberhood could pop up.

Via: @jyarow (Twitter)
Source: The New York Times Dealbook

 
  • Comments
  • 63
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:59 PM on 12/14/2012
I guess I will continue to miss out on everything as I do not have fiber optic service and no hope that they will expand it to this area. The list on what I am missing (and at reduced cost in manycases) just keeps growing.
06:40 PM on 12/14/2012
Active? They haven't finished the network. Not one customer is up and running yet. How can they be the most reliable when there is nothing there yet? I live in KC. There is no Google fiber yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
careym46
michigan state alumnus and fan
06:21 PM on 12/14/2012
i hope someone comes up with a plan that offers me just the channels i want. probably 70 % of channels i pay for,i don't watch.
06:04 PM on 12/14/2012
We could really use something like this in NJ. Cable has us by the b--ls.
04:33 PM on 12/14/2012
Im confused? So is this saying google has internet speeds of 2.55 Mbps which is beyond slower then slow and they are bragging about it? I know my baisc comcast isp speed is 20 Mpbs with a max of over 1000 Mbps availiable.
05:31 PM on 12/14/2012
No they 2.55 is showing the netflix streaming speeds not the overall speeds.
04:17 PM on 12/14/2012
Anything that's cheaper is better - now that we're all "Forced" to pay for cable (Because of mandatory Digital) and crapy TV shows, I want (other) choices that aren't expensive.
02:11 AM on 12/15/2012
Cheaper isn't really the right way to look at Google's Fiber service. Per their website, "Gigabit Internet" is $70/mo or if you want you can get the "Gigabit Internet + TV" for $120/mo. They don't ofer a "phone" service in the traditional sense. If you really want that there's Google Voice, but it's a different program altogether, not like your normal "landline" phone service. But considering you get " up to 1,000 Mb/sec download and upload" speed, it's plain crazy. Also noteworthy, with the "Gigabit Internet + TV" you have a 2 year contract, but also get a Nexus Tablet with the package, while with the Gigabit Internet only it's a 1 year contract. If you want the "cheaper" route that they offer, you have to pay the $300 one time fee and then you have "Free service guaranteed for at least 7 years" ($300.00 divided by 84 months breaks down to $3.57/month if you look at it long term), but you only get "Up to 5Mbps download, 1Mbps upload speed • No data caps". Nice if you only do light browsing and don't play games/watch or listen to streaming content online.
03:48 PM on 12/14/2012
IF GOOGLE OR SOME OTHER COMPANY WOULD COME IN AND GIVE EVERY ONE, EVERY CHANNEL FOR ONE LOW, FLAT PRICE, THEY WOULD FORCE THE OTHER COMPANIES EITHER OUT OF BUSINESS OR TO LOWER THERE PRICES. I HAVE DTV AND WAS ON THE ORIGINAL PACKAGE OFFERED AND WAS ON IT FOR 9 YEARS AND MY BILL KEPT GOING UP AND UP AND UP AND WAS A 100 BUCKS A MONTH. I LOWERED MY BILL 30 BUCKS A MONTH BY DROPPING SPEED, ESPN2, AND MANY OTHERS. THESE BASTARDS ARE GETTING VERY RICH. WHY DO THEY OFFER ALL OF THESE DAMN CHANNELS THAT NO ONE CARES ABOUT? SOME GOOD COMPITITION WITH MUCH LOWER PRICES WOULD SOLVE THE PROBLEM!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Wil80
Ask not for what your Country can do for you.....
03:46 PM on 12/14/2012
Come on over to my city all we have is Time Warner Cable monopoly
01:44 PM on 12/14/2012
Please come to Western New York (Buffalo / Niagara Falls) Time Warner Cable package is for the birds. They always find a reason to raise rates and yet offer you less channels with no decrease
in price. Please GOOGLE come here.
02:29 PM on 12/14/2012
Amen same here in Charlotte, NC TWC sux
05:34 PM on 12/14/2012
eastern NY could use a good alternitive to what is here now. Will this reach into the rural areas as well that others wont as its not "economicly feasable"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:00 PM on 12/14/2012
My extended family uses 3 providers Cox, Dish, and Comcast at $100+ per month; we use our local library and have a much, much better selection than any of them do for FREE (albeit we don't watch reality shows, and the adults watch/hear the news &commentary at work). Using our library's online catalogue, each person in the family can maintain an ongoing order of up to 25 DVD's at a time, then simply pick them up at the counter when they come in (usually in 1-5 days).
Our selection is huge (well over 10,000 DVD's) because we pushed our town councils to created a Consortium among the 8 small towns in our area (including all the schools); which reduces unnecessary/excess duplicate purchases; so now each library can afford to buy more DVD's & books & computers. The consortuim now gets @ 20 new DVD's/CD's/MP3s DAILY, and gets @10-20 donated each day from the community, including numerous educational, professional and science sets, foriegn & indie films. It's a fantastic community service (especially in hard economic times), and a great way to manage/limit what our kids are watching. Can your community can do the same/something similar to share resources and benefit more people?
12:54 PM on 12/14/2012
A roku and antenna work fine for me. Save myself 100 dollars a month.
04:36 PM on 12/14/2012
A roku is fine if you only watch basic tv which is free anyways so if you have an xbox or laptop or computer no need for a roku or antenna since those devices do the same for free. The roku doesnt get cable channels ie HBO showtime, cinemax, movie channel, on demand,cable anywhere on anydevice, discovery channel or A&..The good channels. If you just want stuff like ABC, CBS, NBC,basic Fox and then just the stuff the networks post on their own web sites your fine but Roku and internet tv are not even close to a cable tv replacement option they only replace the basic digital box channels that are over the air.
05:04 PM on 12/14/2012
I have netflix and Hulu plus..... all I need. I don't have to pay for hundreds of stations I don't watch..... sports, foreign language, etc. I get my news from my antenna. I STILL save a hundred a month with the extra channels I purchase on my Roku, and I get plenty of free stations to watch that Roku provides. And I have my computer. Works for me!
12:28 PM on 12/14/2012
WE NEED YOU HERE IN BALTIMORE MARYLAND. COMCAST IS LOUSY. VERIZON USES DIRECT TV. FIOS IS ONLY IN SELECTED AREAS. PLEASE COME HERE
04:37 PM on 12/14/2012
Whats your comcast internet speeds there? here in Chicago i have basic internet at 20 Mbps but have the option to to up to 1GBps ie 1000 Mbps if I wish to upgrade.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 AM on 12/14/2012
I think Google is getting to big and has it's nose into to many industries.
To many aspects of your consumer behavior and personal info handled by one company.
That can't be good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onebluebrick
12:04 PM on 12/14/2012
Unah: too big and too many.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 PM on 12/14/2012
lol..yeah..thanks
11:34 AM on 12/14/2012
I cancelled my lousy cable service two years ago and they took the box BUT left the programming on. Very nice company, eh?
11:30 AM on 12/14/2012
Please come to Riverside, San Diego, Imperial and San Bernardino, CA counties!!! The only reason I'm with TWC is their market area includes San Diego stations here in T Town. I changed to Direct TV, and Verizon, only to go back to TWC for local San Diego channeling. Ever one else was all LA.